Given the Republican’s dominance politically in Montana, it’s long past time to focus on the judiciary, starting with the Supreme Court. Regarding “NGOs” in this state, how many are funded by USAID and other traitorous government entities? Hopefully DOGE will defund them asap!
While there are no doubt some deep-pocketed NGOS in this domain, sometimes the smaller ones have a huge impact too.
I've been seeing a non-profit Colorado Coalition for a Livable Climate pop up at virtually anything climate related in Colorado, from bills in the legislature to city and county meetings. When you try to trace their money stream, it's next to a rounding error.
Last month for example, there was Larimer County Planning Commission meeting to hear the case for adding new gas turbines to the Rawhide Power Station in Northern Colorado. At least 20 of them showed up, in person asking the Chair they all be allowed to speak in a certain order.
Colorado Coalition for a Livable Climate also showed up to the recent House Bill to redefine nuclear energy as a clean energy source in CO statute. In that hearing it was a battle of the green NGOs in opposition versus us nuke dorks with power plant labor unions in support.
On top of that the usual deep pocked climate NGOs show up too such as ConservationColorado, GreenLatinos, 350Colorado, and the state's Sierra Club Chapter.
Very good information! I wonder what percentage of these are funded by the government, Soros, Gates Foundation, Rockefeller foundation etc etc. They all need to be exposed, every single one of them and who bankrolls them.
The real solution is to separate the 5% of spent fuel that is fission products from the 95% that is unused fuel. 9.26% of fission products — 0.46% of spent fuel — caesium and strontium — need custody for 300 years. Half the rest are innocuous before thirty years, and the remainder aren't even radioactive.
Unused fuel, actually just the 1.1% of it that's plutonium-239, needs custody for 300,000 years. It's daft to pretend it can be hidden for that long. A much better idea is to convert it to electricity and fission products. Only fast neutron reactors can consume all of it. The up side is we'd use 100% of the energy immanent in mined uranium, not the 0.6% that we use today. USA has 90,000 tonnes of spent fuel and 900,000 tonnes of depleted uranium. Uranium is consumed at the rate of about one tonne per GWe year. A million tonnes of uranium could power an all-electric all-nuclear American energy economy for more than 500 years without mining, milling, refining, enriching, or importing one new gram of uranium.
Deep detail in "Plentiful Energy" by Charles E. Till and Yoon Il Chang. Summary in chapter 7 of my book "Where Will We Get Our Energy?" Everything quantified. No vague handwaving. 350 bibliographic citations allow readers to verify I didn't simply make up stuff.
Given the Republican’s dominance politically in Montana, it’s long past time to focus on the judiciary, starting with the Supreme Court. Regarding “NGOs” in this state, how many are funded by USAID and other traitorous government entities? Hopefully DOGE will defund them asap!
Or maybe that EPA money funneling scheme?
Yeah, there seems to be lots of schemes to be found and deleted. Enjoyed your article!
While there are no doubt some deep-pocketed NGOS in this domain, sometimes the smaller ones have a huge impact too.
I've been seeing a non-profit Colorado Coalition for a Livable Climate pop up at virtually anything climate related in Colorado, from bills in the legislature to city and county meetings. When you try to trace their money stream, it's next to a rounding error.
Last month for example, there was Larimer County Planning Commission meeting to hear the case for adding new gas turbines to the Rawhide Power Station in Northern Colorado. At least 20 of them showed up, in person asking the Chair they all be allowed to speak in a certain order.
Colorado Coalition for a Livable Climate also showed up to the recent House Bill to redefine nuclear energy as a clean energy source in CO statute. In that hearing it was a battle of the green NGOs in opposition versus us nuke dorks with power plant labor unions in support.
On top of that the usual deep pocked climate NGOs show up too such as ConservationColorado, GreenLatinos, 350Colorado, and the state's Sierra Club Chapter.
https://www.greenleapforward.wtf/p/try-to-follow-the-money-colorado
https://www.greenleapforward.wtf/p/you-cant-have-it-both-ways-northern
That’s crazy!!
Very good information! I wonder what percentage of these are funded by the government, Soros, Gates Foundation, Rockefeller foundation etc etc. They all need to be exposed, every single one of them and who bankrolls them.
Thank you for your work. Interesting article.
The real solution is to separate the 5% of spent fuel that is fission products from the 95% that is unused fuel. 9.26% of fission products — 0.46% of spent fuel — caesium and strontium — need custody for 300 years. Half the rest are innocuous before thirty years, and the remainder aren't even radioactive.
Unused fuel, actually just the 1.1% of it that's plutonium-239, needs custody for 300,000 years. It's daft to pretend it can be hidden for that long. A much better idea is to convert it to electricity and fission products. Only fast neutron reactors can consume all of it. The up side is we'd use 100% of the energy immanent in mined uranium, not the 0.6% that we use today. USA has 90,000 tonnes of spent fuel and 900,000 tonnes of depleted uranium. Uranium is consumed at the rate of about one tonne per GWe year. A million tonnes of uranium could power an all-electric all-nuclear American energy economy for more than 500 years without mining, milling, refining, enriching, or importing one new gram of uranium.
Deep detail in "Plentiful Energy" by Charles E. Till and Yoon Il Chang. Summary in chapter 7 of my book "Where Will We Get Our Energy?" Everything quantified. No vague handwaving. 350 bibliographic citations allow readers to verify I didn't simply make up stuff.